I finally watched Easy Rider.
Jack Nicholson delivers a lucidly written commentary on the inability of "our antiquated systems" to accept the shock of a Venusian society without leaders, where all are provided for in health, food and transportation; equally. And the next evening, after a nasty encounter with some local yokels, he explains to Dennis Hopper's character that one problem with our country is how those who are free in name but not in reality fear true individual freedom, and respond with indolence and violence. In this instance, two men who tear-ass around the country on motorcycles, flaunting established behavior threatens the communal illusion of freedom; an illusion men will kill to defend.
Cut to the three sleeping men being beaten by the local rednecks. JN is beaten to death. At DH's persuation, the remaining two roll JN's corpse for money and continue on to debauchery and Mardi Gras. Peter Fonda's character regrets this decision, but lets himself be pushed into it. He might be a man of integrity with no direction. The movie ends when two back-country locals decide to scare the two motorcyclists by menacing DH with a shotgun from their pickup truck. He-yuck. DH flips them off, which they take as probable cause to shoot him in the face. As PF rides for help, they shoot him as well and leave him and his bike as a fireball on the side of the country road. No wrongdoing. No sermon. No regret. Fin.
That's just the way it is.
What's the right word for the attitude where you can catalog someone in a different column from you and consequently or subsequently deny them any respect or human dignity. And you aren't even angry about it. You're just sporting, as is your God-given right. Is that indolence? Contempt? Marginalization? Disregard? And then what do you call it when you give someone different from you the right to exist, but not the right to exist in fullness; to be equal; to be accountable? What are the names for those gradations? 1. You are not human. 2. You are less human than I am. 3. We are equal.
You know what Orwell said about words/names and their corresponding ideas. That sort of _______ attitude is a contributing factor, if not basis of things like hate crimes, genocide, forced sterilizations, abortion bans, gay marriage bans, enforced poverty and rape. So what's the word?

3 comments:
Could I get an easier question?
Sensitivity to the humanity of people not closely connected with you is not always a given. Before women's suffrage, it could sincerely be argued by presumably well meaning people, that women should be treated essentially as children in matters of legal fact, subordinate, incomplete decision makers. It seems to be quite easy to regard people not connected closely with you as less deserving.
That said, becoming desensitized to the suffering of others is an altogether different step. Knowing and accepting philosophically that animals are less intelligent and less capable of making complex decisions about their lives than yourself and other humans doesn't make you reflexively insensitive to the suffering of animals.
So there's the first step, which is to take away someone's agency and their equality. The second step, Easy Rider leaps over. That of being utterly inured to the suffering of the lesser.
Throughout history there have always been tiers of agency. But to cause suffering in someone who can clearly suffer has always been a sign of degeneracy.
What's the right word for the attitude where you can catalog someone in a different column from you and consequently or subsequently deny them any respect or human dignity. And you aren't even angry about it. You're just sporting, as is your God-given right. Is that indolence? Contempt? Marginalization? Disregard?......."Sinful"
Chauvinism: unreasoning devotion to one's race, sex, etc, with contempt for other races, the opposite sex, etc.
-P
Post a Comment